Share |

Wrist Watch Review: Part 8 – Seiko Map Meter (Mile Marker) Perpetual Calendar 200M – 8F56

This is a review of the wrist watches I have collected over the years. I go into some details about why I decided to buy them and explain a little about their operation and movements. Seiko Chronograph Water Resistant 200m – 7T32-6R28 Seiko Kinetic (SCUBA) Diver’s 200m wrist watch – 5M62 movement Seiko Automatic (SCUBA) Diver’s 200m wrist watch – 7S26 Seiko Automatic (SCUBA) Diver’s 200m wrist watch – 4R15 Seiko Map Meter / Mile Marker Perpetual Calendar 200M – 8F56 Casio G-Shock GW-2500B Casio WS-300 Citizen Eco-Drive Perpetual Calendar WR 100 – Calibre 8700 Citizen Eco-Drive WR 200 Radio controlled / atomic clock

  1. LordHewing
    January 19th, 2012 at 23:45 | #1

    I leather cover would protect it if you don’t mind a delay while you remove the cover to read the time? You could line the inside of the cover with something very soft.
    Perhaps that scratch can be polished out too?.
    .
    A somewhat macho solution could be a leather bracer with the cover Velcro’d down? ehehe
    Veeeeery nice watch!

  2. LordHewing
    January 20th, 2012 at 00:04 | #2

    PS – This kind of technology is the best. I refer to the distance gauging device in particular.
    It’s a very pertinent survival tool and survival means being able to sustain yourself while digital technology makes us very dependent on the outside world.
    If a satellite gets zapped by a waring country or spying dispute, virus, malfunction, whatever, then it’s back to a more tangible means of existence

  3. mjlorton
    January 20th, 2012 at 07:50 | #3

    @LordHewing LOL….well that’s a throw back to the 80′s…I actually looked for something like that on Amazon…I may have to have another look or make my own. Thanks for the feedback.

  4. mjlorton
    January 20th, 2012 at 07:51 | #4

    @LordHewing Indeed…I have my own thoughts on how we are becoming far too reliant on electronics. Thanks for the input.

  1. January 25th, 2012 at 18:41 | #1
  2. January 25th, 2012 at 18:42 | #2
  3. January 25th, 2012 at 18:46 | #3